21st century calls for humanely designed prisons


There is a growing trend in Scandinavian countries to adopt new styles of prison design that focuses on prisoner-rehabilitation. It's definitely time for the rest of the world to catch up, especially the US.

Karianne Jackson is one of the pioneers of reforming the prison systems in the US, shifting the focus from bare punishment to rehabilitation. A former director of the North Dakota Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, Jackson is currently leading a statewide Justice Reinvestment Initiative (JRI) in the US.

JRI is a programme designed to identify and implement foreign correctional principles that focus on reducing repeat offences to the American system.

So how did Jackson go from director of a department within the system to someone who wants to change it monumentally?

In 2015, she partook in a program where US prison officials travelled abroad to observe different prison systems. Before the trip, she did not expect to see anything out the ordinary — same old jail cells, cafeterias, guards, rules.

“What was I really going to see other than what I call the ‘IKEA prison’, right?”

Unexpectedly, she remembers feeling humiliated by what she saw in Norway at the Halden Prison. Halden was a better prison. Better in all aspects of its definition: design, environment, relationships. Simply, a pleasant place.

Associating prison with pleasantry seems alien. We are used to perceiving prisons as holes of punishment for those who commit a crime and deserve a horrendous life. In contrast, Halden Prison was all things non-horrendous. Karianne describes it as a “college campus”.

β€œIt feels like a college campus. And not just because of the physical environment that looks like dorms, and classes, and libraries. It feels like a college campus because it feels like people are there to learn something, and the staff is there to teach something.”

Can design foster humane treatment?

Karianne saw that Halden consisted of cottages, each of which hosts around twelve rooms, a common area to cook and lounge in, and lots of windows. She observed a clear link between prison architecture and a healthy environment.

As a prison professional with a Masters Degree in Forensic Psychology, she was curious to understand how design can affect behaviour change in prisons.

The Norwegian prison design reflects a non-traditional moral perspective on crime, punishment, and humanity. The design manifests a sense of trust, it gives prisoners privacy for better chances of rehabilitation.

Surrounded by a single wall, the prison does not have any electric fences, barbed wires or watchtowers. It has individual rooms without one-way windows to peek in, real utensils in kitchens, and gardens to roam about.

One of the most interesting aspects of the Norwegian prison system is that guards mingle with prisoners to eliminate any possibility of a dichotomized relationship. Everyone hangs out together, plays sports, and more

All these elements create a space for prisoners to feel human. Since this swap in the 1980s to what is called a “humane prison design”, the percentage of prisoner relapses in Norway decreased from 40% to 20%.

Halden is definitely not an anomaly. It reflects a larger discussion and research on how design can improve the correctional system.

Karianne’s current reform project makes explicit the links between architecture, organizational change, behavioural modifications among prisoners, and an overall reduction in reoffending. This project stemmed from a stark difference between Norwegian and American prison systems.

The American prison system needs to change

What Jackson witnessed at Halden was the total opposite of what she regularly saw in the US prison system in which the rehabilitation aspect of correctional facilities is often disregarded.

The United States is the world leader in incarceration, the country is locking up more prisoners than any other nation in the world. On top of this, for every four people who get released three ends up returning to prison.

The criticism towards America's punitive system has been gradually growing. People are realizing that a system based on dehumanization works neither short nor long-term.

One of the biggest issues US prisons face is the length of prison sentences. Since the 1980s, almost all crimes - murder, sexual assault, robbery, possession - have had very lengthy sentences. There are laws in place that maintain these lengths. For instance, “the truth-in-sentencing” laws force inmates to spend around 85 percent of their sentence before qualifying for parole.

The “tough on crime” policies establish a very crude system of incarceration. And Karianne Jackson is aiming to change these policies so the US can come closer to a Halden-esque prison system. She wants to implement designs and behaviour patterns that help prisoners realize other people care about them and are motivated to help them. In turn, increasing their willingness and ability to rehabilitate.

Establishing a humanely designed prison is a challenging task. It questions our own conceptions of crime and punishment. More so, it challenges our notion that design is for spacecraft, cars, and coffee machines.

What the people behind designing Halden, and other humane prisons alike, and Kariane Jackson are doing is approaching the phenomenon that is crime and punishment with the recognition of its complexity. And with the simple yet profound acknowledgement that the moral base of prison systems should be rehabilitation and not retribution.

More Stories

  • The Sky has a Limit

    Company blogs

    Join us for the second of our Kinder Conversations - the Sky has a Limit.

    Following our investigation into the Future of Meat in February, we've turned our attention to the sky. We'll be talking about whether air travel can be more sustainable, and how.

    We're delighted to be hosting this event in collaboration with our friends at TQ, the Amsterdam tech hub where we're based. 

    πŸ“… When Monday 17 June 18:30 - 20:30
    πŸ“­ Where TQ, Singel 542, Amsterdam
    🎯 Why should I fly Kinder? To hear about the latest research and technology making air travel more sustainable. To find out what you can do to reduce the impact your flights are having. To share a drink with like-minded travelers, and sample some of our vegan snacks (including beloved Professor Grunschnabel ice cream, as seen at the Future of Meat event)

    🎫 How can I get in? We’re offering two ticket levels: Economy (free) and Business Class (for the price of a donation to Cool Earth). Secure your seat now!

    More about The Sky has a Limit

    Here at Kinder, we believe that greener travel is one of the key ways in which we can tackle the climate crisis. Travelling green can mean a lot of things, but right now we’re concerned about the aviation industry.  

    If aviation were a country, it’d be a top 10 polluter - and C02 emissions from air travel are growing many times faster than any other form. We’re already in a very dangerous position, and although there are many potential solutions, we sometimes feel overwhelmed and uncertain about what to do about it.

    That’s where Kinder Conversations comes in.

    Kinder Conversations is a series of events which delve into the biggest issues facing the world. 

    At the Sky has a Limit, we’ll be bringing together representatives from research and technology, the aviation industry and the not-for-profit sector to talk about sustainable air travel. We’ll hear more about the problem, and a lot more about the solutions.

    Plus, there’ll be time to get a drink from TQ’s bar (buying a drink helps our friends from TQ support more events like this), try some vegan ice cream, and chat to fellow travellers about the steps you can take to travel greener.

    ✈️ Are you ready to #flykinder? Then secure your boarding pass here

    Read more
  • How flying cars could help solve the problem of air pollution


    I don't have a driving license and when pressed about getting one by friends tired of chauffeuring me around I usually say I will only get one if I can drive something cool, like the Batmobile or a flying car. Unfortunately, I might have to honour that promise as it seems that flying cars are finally taking off (alas, no commercial Batmobiles in sight).

    Indeed, several promising startups around the world are working to deliver the "car of the future"  over the next few years. Like the Dutch company PAL-V that showed off a limited edition of its flying car at the Geneva Auto Show in Switzerland.

    The PAL-V is a hybrid between a car and a helicopter (or more precisely, a gyrocopter), able to reach a top speed of 160 km/h on the tarmac but also get airborne in just 5 minutes, hitting airspeeds of 180 km/h over a range of up to 500 km. But since buying a PAL-V will set you back around € 350,000 I might have to pass on this one. Moreover, flying this beauty requires not just a driving license but also (understandably) a license to fly, and that's just too much for me.


    Thankfully, other companies are developing vehicles that need no driver at all. Aerospace manufacturer Bell Helicopter, for example, is working on Nexus, an air taxi capable of taking off and landing in the middle of a city (whereas the PAL-V still needs a runway, albeit short, to get airborne).

    Called VTOLs (short for Vertical Take Off and Landing), these aircraft aim to become sort of an Uber of urban air travel, bringing customers to the opposite part of the city or even to a nearby city in a matter of few minutes.

    If you're at JFK airport in New York, for example, and have a meeting in Manhattan, instead of embarking on a 1-hour, Cosmopolis-style taxi ride, you could just hail a flying car and be downtown in 5 minutes.  

    Futuristic as it may sound, concrete plans to make it come true are underway. Earlier this month, German startup Lilium successfully completed the first test of its new five-seater Lilium Jet, an electric vehicle that, according to the company, will have a range of 300 km and a top speed of 300 km/h. 

    The reason electric flight is such an exciting area of research is not just because flying taxis will allow a handful of high rollers to drastically cut on their commuting time. Electric flying cars might be really good for the environment too.

    A recent study published by Nature highlighted that, in some cases, flying cars could eventually be greener than even electric road cars, cutting emissions while reducing traffic on increasingly busy roads.

    Moreover, developments in the field of flying cars could also boost the research on electric flight at large, including long haul electric flights, sort of the Holy Grail of aviation. And, as known, the civil aviation industry needs to find effective ways to lower its carbon emissions as soon as possible. 

    However, as explained by Hugh Hunt in an article on The Conversation that we republished here on Kinder World, "gaps in necessary technology and practical uncertainties beyond the cars’ promising physics mean that they may not arrive in time to be a large-scale solution to the energy crisis and congestion." 

    Read more
  • Why the current state of aviation is one of the main threats to our planet


    Let's get this one thing straight: most people prefer flying to other modes of transport, and we seem to do it more and more often. The airline industry is booming and 4.1 billion passengers have been transported last year. Almost every figure one looks at shows the impressive increase in flights over the last two decades.

    Alexandre de Juniac, head of the International Association for Flight Transport proclaims: “In 2000, the average citizen flew just once every 43 months. In 2017, the figure was once every 22 months. Flying has never been more accessible. And this is liberating people to explore more of our planet for work, leisure, and education. Aviation is the business of freedom."  

    However, this ‘business of freedom’ runs on fossil energy carriers as planes still almost exclusively fly on kerosene. Kerosene is a fuel produced by oil refining and carbon dioxide (CO2) is the major product of burning kerosene. The 2-5% of all global CO2 emissions the aviation industry emits is caused by its fuel consumption (and choice). And unlike other fuels like diesel or gasoline, airlines don't pay taxes on kerosene in most countries — making cheap air travel possible.

    In 2018 Europe’s biggest airline Ryanair became number 9 in the list of Europe’s biggest CO2 emitters and still claims to be the ‘greenest and cleanest airline’. Andrew Murphy – the aviation manager at the European Federation for Transport and Environment — argues that Ryanair the new coal when it comes to climate pollution. Ryanair CEO Michael O’Leary, on the other hand, dismisses such claims by saying the claims are ‘’complete and utter rubbish’’.

    Other airlines, like KLM who partly uses renewable jet-fuel, are acknowledging the problem but they aren't too far behind Ryanair on the list of emitters. 

    The growth of the industry is not expected to slow down. India and China are the biggest growth markets, the latter alone is building 200 new commercial airports in the next ten years. Moreover, industry forecasts suggest that emissions will rise by 700% until 2050 which amounts to more than 4% of the world’s remaining carbon budget.

    If we want to reach the goals of the Paris Agreement, every the average earthling has a quota of two tons of CO2 per annum but just a return trip between New York and Amsterdam generates three tons already.

    Compared to other modes of transport planes are the biggest CO2 emitters per travelled kilometre followed by cars, buses and finally trains which are the least polluting. The CO2 emissions, however, are only one half of the medal. The impact of flying on global warming is different than most other transport as it happens in the air high above the ground where the processes that cause or reduce global warming happen. These include CO2 and nitrogen oxide emission but also cloud formation, ozone and soot as well as methane reduction.

    The climate impact of the emitted greenhouse gases in the stratosphere are three times higher than on the ground. Flying also causes condensation trails and fog clouds in certain weather conditions. Such clouds can have a warming or a cooling effect on the climate. One way to improve the climate effect of flying would be planning better routes where warming clouds are avoided and the formation of cooling clouds is favoured — our current routes have an overall warming effect.

    So, hypothetically, some flights with clever flight-route planning might even reduce global warming. However, as we don't have time to hypothesise, we need to find and urgently implement other ways to bring down the impact of flying, like using better fuels or even better planes.

    This article was written by Eric Schuler for Kinder World. Schuler is a PhD candidate at the University of Amsterdam and works on new industrial sustainable chemistries to turn captured CO2 into useful things such as plastics or fuel. He's also a photojournalist with an interest in climate and land-use change.

    This story features:
    Read more